Se connecter
Rechercher

Variabilité de l'efficacité de l'érythromycine et de la spiramycine sur les pathogènes parodontaux dans les parodontites agressives. Etude in vitro comparative.

Auteurs : Lakhssassi N1, Sixou M
Affiliations : 1Department of Epidemiology of Infectious Disease, Laboratory of the Buccal and Biomaterial Ecosystem, Faculty of Oral Surgery-Toulouse, Université Paul-Sabatier, 3 chemin des Maraîchers, 31062 Toulouse cedex 04, France.
Date 2005 Octobre-Novembre, Vol 53, Num 8-9, pp 527-35Revue : Pathologie-biologieType de publication : étude comparative; article de périodique; DOI : 10.1016/j.patbio.2005.06.008
Résumé

Erythromycin (ERY) and spiramycin (SPI) are the most frequently prescribed macrolides by dentists. However, the emergence of resistant anaerobic subgingival bacteria imposes an increased vigilance. This study aims to compare these macrolides efficacy on principal periopathogens.Erythromycin (ERY) and spiramycin (SPI) are the most frequently prescribed macrolides by dentists. However, the emergence of resistant anaerobic subgingival bacteria imposes an increased vigilance. This study aims to compare these macrolides efficacy on principal periopathogens.Twenty adult patients with aggressive periodontitis were selected and a total of 60 samples were taken from subgingival flora. Bacterial strains of Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, Tannerella forsythia, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Peptostreptococcus micros and Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans were isolated according to J. Slots's rapid identification method. The susceptibilities to ERY and SPI were studied using disk diffusion susceptibility test and minimum inhibitory concentration test (MIC test).Erythromycin (ERY) and spiramycin (SPI) are the most frequently prescribed macrolides by dentists. However, the emergence of resistant anaerobic subgingival bacteria imposes an increased vigilance. This study aims to compare these macrolides efficacy on principal periopathogens.Twenty adult patients with aggressive periodontitis were selected and a total of 60 samples were taken from subgingival flora. Bacterial strains of Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, Tannerella forsythia, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Peptostreptococcus micros and Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans were isolated according to J. Slots's rapid identification method. The susceptibilities to ERY and SPI were studied using disk diffusion susceptibility test and minimum inhibitory concentration test (...

 Source : MEDLINE©/Pubmed© U.S National Library of Medicine
Accès à l'article
  Accès à distance aux ressources électroniques :
Exporter
Citer cet article
Lakhssassi N, Sixou M. Variabilité de l'efficacité de l'érythromycine et de la spiramycine sur les pathogènes parodontaux dans les parodontites agressives. Etude in vitro comparative. Pathologie-biologie. 2005 Oct;53(8-9):527-35.
Courriel(Nous ne répondons pas aux questions de santé personnelles).
Dernière date de mise à jour : 01/09/2017.


[Haut de page]

© CHU de Rouen. Toute utilisation partielle ou totale de ce document doit mentionner la source.