Se connecter
Rechercher

La contraception masculine.

Auteurs : Demoulin ADate 1984 Avril 1, Vol 39, Num 7, pp 266-72Revue : Revue médicale de LiègeType de publication : article de périodique;
Résumé

Among the reasons why male hormonal contraception has lagged behind female methods are the necessity of preserving virility, the fact that spermatogenesis is a continuous process, the need to control secondary effects and toxicity, and the requirement that modes of administration be acceptable to both partners. Among currently available reversible mehtods, withdrawal is undoubtedly the most ancient. It is still widespread but cannot be recommended because of its limited effectiveness. The condom is used by about 10% of couples worldwide as a principal or temporary method, but its inter-ference with sensation has limited its acceptance. Condoms are nevertheless highly effective when used with a spermicide. Various androgens are currently under investigation. High doses of testosterone can induce azoospermia without affecting libido but their side effects may be serious. The use of combinations of steroids permits doses to be reduced and offers promise for the future. The combination of oral medroxyprogesterone acetate and percutaneous testosterone is one of the better approaches; the combination is effective and nontoxic but has the disadvantage of percutaneous administration. Gossypol, a pigment extracted from the cotton plant, has been used as a contraceptive in China with a reported efficacy of 99.89%, recovery of fertility within 3 months, and no effect on future fertility. However, its toxicity appears to be significant in the animal and its reversibility is uncertain. A search is on for analogs which would preserve the contraceptive effects while eliminating toxic effects. Several gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) analogs under investigation for their interference with spermatogenesis have given promising results. Several chemicals tested for contraceptive effects have had unacceptably high toxicity. Chinese investigators have reported good results with various physical methods of interfering with sperm production, but their reversibility and innocuity have not been demonstrated. Among irreversible methods, many workers have sought an active or passive mehtod of immunizing against paregnancy, but no usable results have yet been obtained. Vasectomy is a simple and easy surgical procedure which is well accepted in some countries, although in most countries the responsibility for contraception is assumed by the women. Vasectomy has 1 advantage over female sterilization: sperm may be preserved in a bank for several years.

Mot-clés auteurs
Androgens; Barrier Methods; Biology; Coitus Interruptus; Condom; Contraception; Contraception Research; Contraception; Immunological; Contraceptive Agents; Contraceptive Agents; Male; Contraceptive Methods; Economic Factors; Endocrine System; Family Planning; Family Planning; Behavioral Methods; Hormones; Male Contraception; Male Sterilization; Medroxyprogesterone Acetate; Physiology; Reproductive Control Agents; Research And Development; Spermatogenesis Blocking Agents; Sterilization; Sexual; Technology; Testosterone;
 Source : MEDLINE©/Pubmed© U.S National Library of Medicine
Chercher l'article
Accès à distance aux ressources électroniques :
Sur Google Scholar :  Sur le site web de la revue : En bibliothèques :
Exporter
Citer cet article
Demoulin A. La contraception masculine. Revue médicale de Liège. 1984 Avr 1;39(7):266-72.
Courriel(Nous ne répondons pas aux questions de santé personnelles).
Dernière date de mise à jour : 20/10/2016.


[Haut de page]

© CHU de Rouen. Toute utilisation partielle ou totale de ce document doit mentionner la source.