Preferred Label : fragmentation reaction;
Detailed label : fragmentation reaction in mass spectrometry;
IUPAC definition : A fragmentation reaction may be written: \[{M}_{1} { }\rightarrow {M}_{2} { } {M}_{3}\]
The decomposition of a metastable ion of mass-to-charge ratio m 1 z 1 into an ion
of mass-to-charge ratio m 2 z 2 after electric acceleration of the metastable ion
and before magnetic deflection gives rise to a peak in the mass spectrum at an apparent
mass, m 2 2 z 1 m 1 z 2 2. The symbol m * should be used to indicate the apparent
mass of the product ions giving rise to this peak. Traditionally, the peak itself
has been called a metastable peak and this should preferably be expressed as metastable
ion peak. It is nevertheless recommended that the former term should be retained.
The word metastable should never be used as a noun. Its use as an adjective should
be limited to such terms as metastable ion, where it is used correctly, and to the
special case of metastable peak discussed above. It should never be used in such terms
as metastable reaction, metastable decomposition, metastable studies, etc. It should
be clear that the metastable ion is the ion that undergoes fragmentation; it is not
detected. When a reaction is written with an asterisk above the arrow as shown: \[{M}_{1}
{ }\overset{{*}}{\rightarrow }{M}_{2} { } {M}_{3}\] this means that the reaction has
been confirmed by the observation of a metastable peak. The textual description of
such a process may be written as, for example, (m *, 43 28, calcd. 18.2, obsd. 18.3)
meaning 'for the fragmentation m/z 43 m/z 28 a metastable peak at m/z 18.3 (calculated
18.2) has been observed'.; A fragmentation reaction may be written: \[{M}_{1} { }\rightarrow {M}_{2} { } {M}_{3}\]
The decomposition of a metastable ion of mass-to-charge ratio m 1 z 1 into an ion
of mass-to-charge ratio m 2 z 2 after electric acceleration of the metastable ion
and before magnetic deflection gives rise to a peak in the mass spectrum at an apparent
mass, m 2 2 z 1 m 1 z 2 2. The symbol m * should be used to indicate the apparent
mass of the product ions giving rise to this peak. Traditionally, the peak itself
has been called a metastable peak and this should preferably be expressed as metastable
ion peak. It is nevertheless recommended that the former term should be retained.
The word metastable should never be used as a noun. Its use as an adjective should
be limited to such terms as metastable ion, where it is used correctly, and to the
special case of metastable peak discussed above. It should never be used in such terms
as metastable reaction, metastable decomposition, metastable studies, etc. It should
be clear that the metastable ion is the ion that undergoes fragmentation; it is not
detected. When a reaction is written with an asterisk above the arrow as shown: \[{M}_{1}
{ }\overset{{*}}{\rightarrow }{M}_{2} { } {M}_{3}\] this means that the reaction has
been confirmed by the observation of a metastable peak. The textual description of
such a process may be written as, for example, (m *, 43 28, calcd. 18.2, obsd. 18.3)
meaning 'for the fragmentation m/z 43 m/z 28 a metastable peak at m/z 18.3 (calculated
18.2) has been observed'.;
Origin ID : F02507;
See also
A fragmentation reaction may be written: \[{M}_{1} { }\rightarrow {M}_{2} { } {M}_{3}\]
The decomposition of a metastable ion of mass-to-charge ratio m 1 z 1 into an ion
of mass-to-charge ratio m 2 z 2 after electric acceleration of the metastable ion
and before magnetic deflection gives rise to a peak in the mass spectrum at an apparent
mass, m 2 2 z 1 m 1 z 2 2. The symbol m * should be used to indicate the apparent
mass of the product ions giving rise to this peak. Traditionally, the peak itself
has been called a metastable peak and this should preferably be expressed as metastable
ion peak. It is nevertheless recommended that the former term should be retained.
The word metastable should never be used as a noun. Its use as an adjective should
be limited to such terms as metastable ion, where it is used correctly, and to the
special case of metastable peak discussed above. It should never be used in such terms
as metastable reaction, metastable decomposition, metastable studies, etc. It should
be clear that the metastable ion is the ion that undergoes fragmentation; it is not
detected. When a reaction is written with an asterisk above the arrow as shown: \[{M}_{1}
{ }\overset{{*}}{\rightarrow }{M}_{2} { } {M}_{3}\] this means that the reaction has
been confirmed by the observation of a metastable peak. The textual description of
such a process may be written as, for example, (m *, 43 28, calcd. 18.2, obsd. 18.3)
meaning 'for the fragmentation m/z 43 m/z 28 a metastable peak at m/z 18.3 (calculated
18.2) has been observed'.
A fragmentation reaction may be written: \[{M}_{1} { }\rightarrow {M}_{2} { } {M}_{3}\]
The decomposition of a metastable ion of mass-to-charge ratio m 1 z 1 into an ion
of mass-to-charge ratio m 2 z 2 after electric acceleration of the metastable ion
and before magnetic deflection gives rise to a peak in the mass spectrum at an apparent
mass, m 2 2 z 1 m 1 z 2 2. The symbol m * should be used to indicate the apparent
mass of the product ions giving rise to this peak. Traditionally, the peak itself
has been called a metastable peak and this should preferably be expressed as metastable
ion peak. It is nevertheless recommended that the former term should be retained.
The word metastable should never be used as a noun. Its use as an adjective should
be limited to such terms as metastable ion, where it is used correctly, and to the
special case of metastable peak discussed above. It should never be used in such terms
as metastable reaction, metastable decomposition, metastable studies, etc. It should
be clear that the metastable ion is the ion that undergoes fragmentation; it is not
detected. When a reaction is written with an asterisk above the arrow as shown: \[{M}_{1}
{ }\overset{{*}}{\rightarrow }{M}_{2} { } {M}_{3}\] this means that the reaction has
been confirmed by the observation of a metastable peak. The textual description of
such a process may be written as, for example, (m *, 43 28, calcd. 18.2, obsd. 18.3)
meaning 'for the fragmentation m/z 43 m/z 28 a metastable peak at m/z 18.3 (calculated
18.2) has been observed'.